Aaron Miller

Aaron Miller

Provo, UT

The Illusion of Moral Decline

The idea that the world is getting worse is a nearly universal human belief. But I’ve often found it strange to believe that people today are less moral than they were, say, 100 years ago. Pick the time period and people have always been a mix of good and evil.

A belief in moral decline probably happens because it’s easy to find evidence of (1) evil in our newsfeeds and (2) good in our memories, making us believe that people are worse than they used to be. This creative paper in Nature by Mastroianni and Gilbert explains the mechanism, and shows how this belief in moral decline contradicts how we see those who are close to us.

Anecdotal evidence indicates that people believe that morality is declining. In a series of studies using both archival and original data (n = 12,492,983), we show that people in at least 60 nations around the world believe that morality is declining, that they have believed this for at least 70 years and that they attribute this decline both to the decreasing morality of individuals as they age and to the decreasing morality of successive generations. Next, we show that people’s reports of the morality of their contemporaries have not declined over time, suggesting that the perception of moral decline is an illusion. Finally, we show how a simple mechanism based on two well-established psychological phenomena (biased exposure to information and biased memory for information) can produce an illusion of moral decline, and we report studies that confirm two of its predictions about the circumstances under which the perception of moral decline is attenuated, eliminated or reversed (that is, when respondents are asked about the morality of people they know well or people who lived before the respondent was born). Together, our studies show that the perception of moral decline is pervasive, perdurable, unfounded and easily produced. This illusion has implications for research on the misallocation of scarce resources, the underuse of social support and social influence.

The illusion of moral decline | Nature

What Wellness Doesn’t Fix

As popular as wellness is these days, it’s not going to fix the kinds of problems that do the most damage to people’s health. This article by Katherine Rowland focuses on the issue from the perspective of women, but it has a lot of insights for men, too.

According to one well-trafficked statistic, the social determinants of health – factors like air quality, domestic safety, community support and education access – account for as much as 80% of health outcomes. But these realities are neatly erased from most wellness marketing.

Magnets Can Disrupt Certain Moral Judgments

If you disrupt a part of the brain—the temporo-parietal junction—with magnets, people have a harder time discerning ill-intent in the actions of others. I don’t know why I hadn’t heard of this study until a few months ago (it’s now over a decade old), but it reveals how complex our minds are when making ethical judgments.

In both experiments, the researchers found that when the right TPJ was disrupted, subjects were more likely to judge failed attempts to harm as morally permissible. Therefore, the researchers believe that TMS interfered with subjects’ ability to interpret others’ intentions, forcing them to rely more on outcome information to make their judgments.

“It doesn’t completely reverse people’s moral judgments, it just biases them,” says Saxe.

The Slowness of Change

I loved this article by Rebecca Solnit, “Slow Change Can Be Radical Change”for how it nails the truth that most big change comes slowly. Sure, there are dramatic moments of change. But they mostly result from the hard work of change made by people toiling away for years beforehand.

And so people give up on change too easily, because they expect too much.

A common source of uninformed despair is when a too-brief effort doesn’t bring a desired result—one round of campaigning, one protest. Or when one loss becomes the basis for someone to decide winning is impossible and quitting—as if you tossed a coin once and decided it always comes up tails.

Also, this is a sparklingly smart passage:

Describing the slowness of change is often confused with acceptance of the status quo. It’s really the opposite: an argument that the status quo must be changed, and it will take steadfast commitment to see the job through. It’s not accepting defeat; it’s accepting the terms of possible victory. Distance runners pace themselves; activists and movements often need to do the same, and to learn from the timelines of earlier campaigns to change the world that have succeeded.

(Via Kottke)

NEWSLETTER

Sign up to get How to Help delivered to your inbox.

No spam and I don’t share your info.

Great! Please check your inbox and click the confirmation link.
Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.