Aaron Miller

Aaron Miller

Provo, UT
Photo of Chad Ford

Peacemaking • Prof. Chad Ford • s03e02

Summary

Why do we struggle to make peace, even when it's what we want most? Professor Chad Ford joins us to explore the roots of conflict and the power of “dangerous love,” a courageous, empathetic approach to healing divisions. From family rifts to global disputes, Chad’s stories and strategies reveal how fear shapes our reactions, why justice must be about restoration, and how anyone can become a peacemaker. This episode offers real-life examples and actionable insights for anyone seeking more harmony in their relationships and communities.

About Our Guest

Chad Ford is an international conflict mediator, facilitator, and peace educator known for his extensive peacebuilding work around the world. He holds a Master’s in Conflict Analysis and Resolution from George Mason University and a JD from Georgetown. He directed the David O. McKay Center for Intercultural Understanding at BYU–Hawaii for nearly twenty years, where he developed programs in intercultural peacebuilding. In 2024, Chad joined Utah State University, teaching courses on religion, peace, and mediation.

He has worked in conflict zones globally, facilitated for governments, NGOs, and corporations, and serves on the board of Peace Players International. Chad is the author of Dangerous Love and 70x7, books that explore transforming conflict and Christian peacebuilding. His hands-on experience gives him a unique perspective on resolving conflicts in families, organizations, and communities worldwide.

Useful Links

Chad Ford’s Book, Dangerous Love:

https://dangerouslovebook.com

Chad's Substack:

https://chadford.substack.com/

PeacePlayers International – Bridging Divides Through Sports:

https://www.peaceplayers.org

Mary Kawena Pukui and the Preservation of Hawaiian Culture:

https://www.missingwitches.com/mary-kawena-pukui-morrnah-simeona-a-unified-unifying-force/

Follow How to Help

Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/how.to.help.pod/

Threads: https://www.threads.com/@how.to.help.pod

Bluesky: https://bsky.app/profile/howtohelp.bsky.social

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/HowToHelpPod

Pleasant Pictures Music

Join the Pleasant Pictures Music Club to get unlimited access to high-quality, royalty-free music for all of your projects. Use the discount code HOWTOHELP15 for 15% off your first year.

Transcript

[00:00:00] Aaron - Interview: How's your family adjusting to Utah? Because that's a big switch from Hawaii, especially after being there so long.

[00:00:06] Chad Ford: This is the first time we've had air conditioning in 20 years. Uh, so, um, that, that has been very, very popular, especially with my teenage girls who are excited to not be sweaty all the time.

[00:00:18] Aaron - Interview: Yeah. Yeah, I don't blame them.

[00:00:20] Aaron - Narration: Hi, I'm Aaron Miller, and this is How to Help, a podcast about having a life and career with meaning, integrity, and impact. This is season three, episode two, Peacemaking. Now, I'll take a moment to say that you may be new to our show. How to Help is proud to join the family of BYU Radio podcasts.

We hope you'll listen to all that we have to share in the episodes to come.

Imagine going to see the newest Tom Cruise action movie. I think he's now up to Mission Impossible Eight, due to come out next year. Well, near the end of the movie, we're imagining his character finally comes face-to-face with the villain. Cruise probably has a limp at this point because of all the intense action before this.

They sit down across from each other in a corporate boardroom. On the top floor of a massive skyscraper. Something tells you that cruise is gonna jump from one of those windows in the very near future. And then the conversation begins. This is the one where the villain typically makes this case of why so many people need to die, or why governments need to be brought to their knees, and so on.

And then you'd expect Cruise to deliver a pithy one-liner, that's followed by a fight to the villain's inevitable death. Whatever disaster was looming, will be averted with obviously just one second to spare.

But what if that's not what happened? What if they just, you know, worked it out? What if whatever old grudge was at the heart of this conflict was laid out and both men found a way to come to some sort of shared understanding?

There could be a whole montage of them sharing their feelings and concerns, apologizing tearfully for their mistakes, finally in the end seeing eye-to-eye, and they decide to embrace each other in a big hug. The villain would then stand down his evil plans, and then the two of them would spend years together as best friends.

I mean, be honest. Would you even want to see this movie? I don't think many people would. There's only ever really one story in action movies. It's the story of good vanquishing evil, and that's what we go to see. Of course, there's plenty of conflict and difficulty along the way, and that's where the action comes in.

And I mean, some of Tom Cruise's stunts are truly incredible. He rode a motorcycle off a cliff in the last one, but if the movie ended with anything other than evil's defeat, I think we'd all leave the theater feeling really unsatisfied. Of course, we want peace restored at the end, but what we really want is justice.

The villain has to lose, not just come around. We like peace, but only after victory.

As much as we like peace, we're also easily entertained by conflict. Consider the state of reality television. There's a reason for having a Real Housewives show that takes place in, and this is a long list. Orange County, New York, Atlanta, New Jersey, DC, Beverly Hills, Miami, Potomac, Dallas, Salt Lake City, and Dubai. There's no shortage of people who can be terrible to each other and no lack of an audience excited to watch it all happen.

But all this conflict, were it real in our own lives, would make us miserable. And we know that because the conflicts that we do have make us miserable. In our families, at work, in our neighborhoods, and across our nations conflict is a pervasive source of deep unhappiness. Some conflicts are fresh and recent, and some have lasted for years. And they never entertain us. They only hurt us.

[00:04:04] Chad Ford: Conflict is hard. It distracts us. When we're in a negative conflict spiral. It's often all we can think about and we start to see the entire world through that lens. We start to mistrust even other people because of the hurt or pain or whatever that you feel in the way. So whatever is hard about doing the peace, we can't forget that the conflict itself is hard and in many ways is a cancer that is slowly eroding and eating us away.

[00:04:32] Aaron - Narration: Here at the start of the episode, consider what's maybe the most important thing.

There's no Tom Cruise coming to defeat our villains, to kill off the cancer of conflict in our lives. If we want to escape the contention, the simmering resentment, the distrust, we need to find a better way out. We have to be our own heroes, but not the action kind that defeats enemies. Peace building is perhaps one of the hardest and most heroic things we'll ever set out to do.

[00:05:03] Chad Ford: It's hard, but it's a good hard because the rewards are life changing.

[00:05:09] Aaron - Narration: My guest today is Professor Chad Ford and he's going to help us learn how to find that peace. Chad's an associate professor at Utah State University's Haravi Peace Institute. He's also the author of the book, Dangerous Love: Transforming Fear and Conflict at Home, at Work, and in the World.

[00:05:30] Chad Ford: I like the cancer analogy a lot because, you know, unfortunately a lot of times the response to cancer is chemotherapy and radiation. And anybody that's gone through that, the radiation and chemotherapy is terrible. It makes you nauseated, it, your hair falls out like, you know, it makes you sick. But in many, many cases, and in the case of my stepfather who had had cancer 20 years before, it gave him 20 extra years of life.

When he got cancer the first time, relationships were rocky with lots of family members, including me, and we thought about the gift that that 20 years gave us to, to reconcile, to where he had his whole family around him, loving, supporting. We learned things, he learned things in those 20 years. That chemo, that radiation that he went through 20 years ago was a gift in so many ways because it eradicated his cancer for a long time. However hard this is and how difficult it is to forgive or to confront or to look at these things, um, or what have you, you will look back on it as a gift as opposed to staying estranged, disconnected, broken. Because that, that's a sort of pain that never really heals.

And I've worked with so many people, including family members who then lose somebody and that pain just remains. And I reflect back on my stepfather and the joy and beauty that was in the room when he passed away because the relationships were right. And there's nothing that can bring more peace in an ending moment of life than that, than just to know that we're right with each other.

[00:07:00] Aaron - Narration: I wanted you to hear that story about Chad and his stepfather, so that you could see right from the start that he knows where you're coming from. He knows what it's like to be at odds with someone important to him. But Chad is also a pro at managing conflict. He's not only a professor of peace building, but he's also a professional mediator who's worked in conflict around the globe and at every level, from families going through divorce to boardroom disputes in corporations, and even in the conflict between Israelis and Palestinians, a part of the world that he's worked in for over two decades.

I don't think before talking with Chad that I've ever met someone who's so optimistic about finding a way through conflict. Let me give you an example that's impossible to be cynical about.

For many years now, Chad has been part of an organization called Peace Players International. They bring kids from across conflict divides and have them play sports together.

The program operates in a variety of places around the world, but it has also been in Israel and Palestine for over a decade. But since October 7th, 2023 armed conflict there has led to the deaths of thousands of innocent people. Things have never been as bad as they are now. How do you find hope in circumstances as hard as these?

[00:08:15] Chad Ford: I'm a hopeful guy, first of all, Aaron. I mean, I wouldn't be engaged in this. You know, I, I sometimes talk about impossible conflict and it's what I'm drawn to. So, you know, by, by my very nature, I don't get involved in things that I don't think are possible. Right. And it's, it's just partly the way my brain is oriented, and I think it has to be to a certain extent here.

Yeah, I know it's gonna be hard and brutal, but on the other side, I'm really a hopeful guy. With that said, there's been things that I've seen before that are so beautiful where they started so hard. I've worked with Israelis and Palestinians, you know, for a really long time. I'm hurting like a lot of people are hurting over October 7th.

And you know, the murder and, and, and kidnapping of, of so many innocent Israelis followed by the war in Gaza with the, you know, the, the murder and destruction of, uh, tens of thousands of, of Palestinians, including many, many women and children. And I know this is a very polarizing topic, but as somebody who's like worked on the ground with both of those groups for a long time, I, I have a deep love for them.

And I get to see an aspect of them that very few people in the West get to see, which is that both communities have peace builders in them that have been working tirelessly for decades to find a way to live together and collaborate together. And they've done it at personal risk. They've done it often to the extent that their friends or family or their communities have, uh, judged them or expelled them.

And then you watch what happens in something like October 7th and, and the subsequent war in Gaza. Part of the emotion was, how do we ever come back from this? Like, this is so bad.

One of the nonprofits that I've worked for for a long time that works with young people. Everything shut down after October 7th. You know, the safety of the young people, the safety of the families, all that comes priority. Everything had to be shut down. We can't put anybody in danger. Um, and so we, we essentially shut down, um, the program.

About December, I start getting phone calls from the staff in Israel, the Palestinians, Israelis, saying that the children's mothers are calling us and they are telling us we need to start the program again, because they're losing their kids. And their kids, you know, this, this inability to connect with each other, the the social media bubbles that they're in, everything else, that they're losing them, and we can't lose the progress, um, that we've made. We have to start now, but it's dangerous. We're worried about this or this.

We will come out. The parents said we will guard the, the, the spaces. We will take the risks, because these are too important not to take. And so there was a lot of fear and should we do this? And if there's a one problem, like it's done forever. Right? But also sometimes peace building is about taking risks and their parents, the kids were consenting.

So we started programming in December. We thought it's gonna be a couple groups and families, um, that show up. Within the first week, 80% of the kids and their families were back engaging in peace, peace building talks. Even the most optimistic Chad would've told you that number would've been dramatically lower.

It wasn't starting for like a year and giving the ongoing frustrations that this kept going on, it won't last, that people are gonna get frustrated because this thing is dragging on and on and on. And it's been the opposite of that. They continue to meet, they continue to grow.

And one of the groups that we work with is basketball and

they field the only joint Palestinian Israeli youth basketball team in the country. And we were like, well, we're definitely not putting that team in the league this year because they're gonna go to all of these different gyms that are gonna be fully Israeli. And the kids insisted we're gonna go. There was jeering, people threw things at them, they swore at them.

Those amazing young people, and their parents said, we're gonna play anyway. We're gonna show, you know what's what's possible. And that to me, to be honest, Aaron, may be the biggest miracle I've seen in the last 20 years because the conditions couldn't be worse. The, um, challenges they face couldn't be harder.

Even the most optimistic person has the right to be skeptical, um, and jaded and angry, um, at what's happening. Um, but they know there is no future for any of us unless we find a way, um, to, to live together. And, uh, so they're doing what the adults haven't been able to do. And they're setting an example that, you know, for all of us, most of us that are harboring resentments or, or conflicts in our lives are not the people of Gaza and what they're going through right now, or are not the families of those Israelis.

Who sent their young people off to a peace concert only to see them, you know, murdered or raped. I thought on many occasions over the last, um, year where I've, I've experienced plenty of conflicts on my own moving and teenagers and all sorts of things, if they can do it, I don't care what it is that's in my face, like I can do it too.

[00:13:34] Aaron - Narration: What are the things that stand in the way of our peace? I mean, if the Peace Player families can work through ancient conflicts, what keeps us from dealing with our own usually far less stubborn disagreements? One element that runs through Chad's book and teaching is the role that fear plays in fostering conflict.

Conflict is scary and we're naturally inclined to turn away from it.

[00:13:58] Chad Ford: I think the reason we don't talk about fear, as much as. It's one of those emotions that I think is less socially acceptable to admit to, even than anger. I think there's a certain, like righteous anger or, yeah, there's a certain like, almost like macho to, you know, being angry, but you know, we don't really lionize people who are afraid.

When I was reading Strength to Love by Martin Luther King, in his book he describes this moment where early on in the Civil Rights movement, he was getting a lot of death threats and threats towards his family. And one night in his house, he got a phone call in the middle of the night, um, and he picked up the phone and they said, "I'm gonna blow up your house and kill all of your children in it."

And this was very early in, in the movement. He talks about in the night getting up and pacing and worrying about his family and wondering how in the world he got into this space and just wishing he could go back to writing his sermons every Sunday, and live this sort of peaceful life of as a pastor.

And he, he reported that he was just overcome with fear and he was actually trying to think about how he could step out of the movement, let someone else go into the forefront because he was afraid. He was afraid about what was going to happen to his family. He was afraid it was going to happen about him. So he gets on his knees and he, you know, he says this prayer and, and says, "Look, people are looking at me to do the right thing, but I'm afraid and I don't think I can do it. I don't think I have the strength to do it. Can you help me get out of this?"

And his answer was, "No, but I'm going to give you the strength to go through it." And, and it really ties to the title of the book, the Strength to Love. The strength to love will overcome fear.

[00:15:42] Aaron - Narration: Martin Luther King's courage is inspiring to me, but it also makes me feel small.

I mean, no one's threatening to bomb my house because of a disagreement. My fears about conflict, and probably yours, feel so much tinier than that. Luckily, Chad has empathy for our small but potent fears.

[00:16:02] Chad Ford: I, I, I think first it requires the vulnerability to admit I am afraid. I'm afraid you're gonna take something that's important to me. I'm afraid that my voice isn't being heard. I'm afraid that you don't recognize my identity or that our relationship, you don't see me or value me. I mean, there's so many little different fears that go into this, and because of that, I need to protect myself. And I'm gonna start doing insane things that are about protecting me, but are actually making the conflict worse, but I can't see it, right?

So if I'm running from conflict, I'm making it worse, not better. If I'm fighting with the person, I'm inviting them to be defensive. I'm inviting them to experience fear, and I'm actually escalating the conflict. If I freeze and do nothing right, it, it can come off to other people like, "Oh, he just doesn't care," or "It doesn't, doesn't really matter" right?

But it deeply matters inside whether we're avoiding conflict, whether we're competing or fighting, whether we're just giving in or kind of playing dead. Uh, you know, at those moments. Our, our fear-based responses that are the opposite of what we really actually need, which is collaboration.

[00:17:11] Aaron - Narration: Consider the conflicts in your lives.

What are the fears that are hiding underneath them? For me, I think it's a fear that the wrong that was done will happen again. I'm scared of the pain and unmet expectations or a violated trust. I worry too often about being embarrassed or called out for my mistakes. And to be totally honest, I'm an ethics professor for goodness sakes, and I feel like I'm supposed to be above this sort of thing.

I'm scared of being a hypocrite. All of my worries and all of yours stand in the way of our peace By now, it should make sense why Chad named his book Dangerous Love. We need a kind of love that's courageous in the face of fear.

[00:17:53] Chad Ford: You know, in English, it's tough because um, we use the same word to mean so many different things, right?

[00:18:00] Aaron - Interview: Right.

[00:18:00] Chad Ford: So it's not romantic love that we're talking about here, or you know, in the Greek, Eros. It's not Philia, which is the sort of love where we say like, which, you know, often sort of means friendship or you know, what have you. It's, it's not that. But it's this Agape, this other sort of Greek term of love, which is love because of the value of someone else. Love because I can, I can value the soul force--that's a word Gandhi used a lot--within another, and their needs, wants and concerns matter just as much as mine. You don't have to like the person. You don't have to want to be roommates or be married to the person, or like be best friends with them. You don't have to do any of that to experience that sort of love. But I have to value that your needs and wants and desires are just as important to you as mine are.

Our job is to find a way forward where both of those things can be met.

[00:18:57] Aaron - Narration: You might be listening to all of this and feeling, I don't know, maybe skeptical or perhaps even indignant. The conflict that's been needling you all episode probably wasn't even your fault to begin with. If anyone's the peacemaker in this situation, you are. Isn't it at least sometimes true that we're simply in the right?

[00:19:17] Chad Ford: It's funny you say it's sometimes true. It's, it's, at least from a perception standpoint, it's almost always true, because virtually everybody that comes in my office says, "I'm the peacemaker here. And it's the other person who, who won't move and, and won't change."

And it's so interesting to me, first of all, usually it's one person who will instigate and come in and I'll get the other party to come in, they tell me the exact same story, but in reverse, right? "I'm the peacemaker. I'm the one trying to make a difference. They're the ones who are doing this." I think we get in this mode of, of storytelling and conflict narrative where anything that I might do that maybe you would say, oh, Chad, maybe that wasn't the best decision, or whatever, I felt justified in doing it because it was in response to a slight, or was in response to years of someone's using these words against me or what have you.

So look, the first thing I would say, Aaron, is when I hear that, my first thought is, you don't see your role. These, are... conflicts are dynamic. There are patterns that are involved. And in virtually every case, you are involved in the pattern and you can't see it right now, right? Now, there are conflict escalatory patterns called Contender/Defender where someone's always coming, and I'm the defender, and there's been a lot of political science research about this. There's been family research about it. They're rare. But most of the people that I talk to think that that's what they're in, in a conflict escalation. I"'m the defender. This person's the contender" coming in, but they're rare. But almost always those contender/defenders, even if they're, they exist, they will morph into a conflict spiral, which is an action/reaction model that's coming over time.

People won't stay the defender forever. Eventually I'm going to get pushed to take up arms and try to stop the relentless or constant attacks that are coming in. And so it's so fascinating to me when Jesus tells people, if somebody smites you on the cheek, you know, turn the other cheek. I find that to be incredible conflict advice for a second, right? Because when I slap you, what I expect to happen is that you are gonna slap me back, right? And when you do so, I know this is weird and convoluted, but when you slap me back, it gives me justification for that first slap. It makes me actually feel like, "I was right, because look at you, you're violent or you know you're not Christian because you didn't turn the other cheek" or you know what have it. When we respond to negative conflict with negative conflict, when we respond to contention with contention, it almost always gives the person who instigated it the justification that it was right to start it in the first place, because I've exposed your true self and who you are.

And I see this a lot in like verbal conflicts, right? Someone will insult somebody and then somebody will insult them back and they will be shocked. "I, I can't believe you used that language, or I can't believe you stoop that low." And of course, your insult was always worse than mine. You always escalated it, um, further.

And so for most people, I said, you know, forget about what they're doing for a minute. Let's think about. What we're doing and how we're contributing to that, because that's the part that's the easiest to change, right? Our input into the system is the easiest part to change.

[00:22:30] Aaron - Narration: What about the truly one-sided conflicts? There are people in the world who, because of trauma, mental illness, or just a taste for cruelty, abuse those around them. Where does dangerous love fit in these situations?

[00:22:45] Chad Ford: I wrote a book called Dangerous Love, and unfortunately some people read the book and said, "Oh, so I'm just supposed to stay with my abusive spouse and love them and keep getting punched in the face, right?"

And I'm like, no, no, no. That's, that's, that's not what I mean by that sort of dangerous. I mean, vulnerable, dangerous, not like physically I'm dangerous. But even in those cases, I've found that when I can see the humanity of the other person, I can make decisions like "I'm not gonna live with you anymore, or I'm gonna create very strong boundaries that don't allow you to engage in that behavior anymore. I'm going to call the police because that behavior is dangerous to me and to others. I'm going to force you as a teenager to go into rehab even though you don't want to be there, even though you're gonna hate me because you know I've enrolled you in this wilderness program or what have you."

I can engage in those behaviors, but if I am not blaming, if I'm seeing that person with Agape, if I'm doing it because I'm actually trying to help them so that maybe somewhere down the road we can engage in that sort of collaborative process that will make all the difference in the world in our healing.

[00:23:50] Aaron - Narration: My full interview with Chad lasted for about two hours, and there was so much more to include than I had time for in this episode. That's why I've decided to break the things he said into two parts. In this one, we focused on what it takes to make peace in our own lives and relationships. But what if we want to do it for others too? Chad's taught an entire generation, the same generation, he was inspired to join all those years ago to be professional peacemakers. That episode will come next.

So let's end this part of the conversation by going back to our fascination with action movies. Like I said at the start, we love peace, but only if it comes after justice. Can there really be peace if wrong isn't made right? What about justice?

[00:24:36] Aaron - Interview: Especially in personal relationships where there's conflict, what's the right way to think about justice? Because it doesn't feel like it's appropriate to just say justice should never matter here. It's just about getting in harmony again. Surely having justice be your main priority is probably gonna enhance the conflict. How do we think about justice, not just at the big scale, but also in the the personal conflicts we have?

[00:25:03] Chad Ford: You know, the interesting thing about when we use the word justice is, to me it's a lot like love. It means different things to different people. Justice can mean revenge. We see both culturally, religiously, you know, justice used in those ways. But it's not the only way that justice is used. It's not the only definition, um, for justice. And again, this is where sometimes I feel like English fails us a little bit because we are wont to use the same word to mean a lot of different things.

And living in Hawaii for the last 20 years, I've been fascinated by the Hawaiian word for justice. It's called "pono." And it means justice. It means righteousness. It means things becoming right again. And so when things are "pono," we are right with each other.

And there's another word in Hawaiian, 'cause I love, Hawaiians can do this. You can't do this in English. They'll stack the words together, so when they say ponopono, it means the most, right? Right. So pono can be right and we can be right about a lot of things or what makes right. But what is the most, right? So when we say ponopono, what is the most right? And the most right, is relationships, right?

So I can be right on the facts. I can be right on the merits. I can be right on who started something or who didn't start something. I can be right that my interpretation of my religious text or my political text or, or whatever are right and yours are wrong. But I can also be wrong, at the exact same moment, if I'm not right with you.

Their conflict resolution mechanism is called Ho'oponopono, and is about making things the most right again. And the whole process is about reconciliation. And reconciliation has four strands. It has mercy or forgiveness. It has truth, it has justice, and it has peace. And you can't have one without the other to be reconciled.

So truth has to come out. It's important that we talk about the things that are our conflicts, that we surface them, that we speak them, that we don't hide them or bury them in the ground, or ignore them or forgive them. It's important that we practice forgiveness and mercy towards those that have hurt us. It is important that we seek justice for wholeness' sake, so that, that things that were wrong are made right again. Not about punishment, not about hurting the other person, but about a commitment. And, you know, in faith context, sometimes this is called like restitution, like trying our best to sort of make things right again.

And so having a conversation about justice, without talking about mercy, without talking about truth, without talking about peace, and without frankly talking about reconciliation. The goal is and should be injustice to make us more fully connected, to make us ponopono again. Then I have to think about the justice that builds, about the justice that reconnects, not about the sort of justice that destroys, or tears down, or marginalizes or hurts people in another way.

And then peace is a commitment that whatever we've had in the past, we are gonna work to make sure that it doesn't, that it doesn't happen again.

[00:28:26] Aaron - Narration: The Hawaiian tradition of Ho'oponopono was preserved largely thanks to the work of Mary Kawena Pukui, who documented and restored Hawaiian practices during a century of tumultuous change on the islands.

Although the practice is sadly slimmed down now, and popularized today as a kind of new age self-care, the traditional Ho'oponopono is a mix of ritual, accountability, forgiveness, and healing that Pukui described in part this way:

"Every one of us searched our hearts for any hard feelings of one against the other.

And did some thorough mental house cleaning. We forgave and were forgiven, thrashing out every grudge, peeve, or sentiment among us."

The end goal of this process is to do what Chad Ford described, not to make things right in the sense of achieving justice, but to make right our relationships. I'm inspired by Chad to do this more in my life, and I hope that you are, too.

How To Help is hosted and written by me, Aaron Miller, and produced in collaboration with BYU Radio. My thanks to Erica Price, Kenny Mears, and Blake Morris for their help with this episode. Scoring and mixing was done by Seth Miller, and our music is by Eric Robertson and the Pleasant Pictures Music Club. For more information about this episode, use the links in the show notes.

As always, thank you so much for listening.

A photo of Bill Gates

Giving Away $200+ Billion

If you’re old enough, you may remember the 1985 movie Brewster’s Millions. Richard Pryor plays a minor league baseball player, Monty Brewster, who inherits $30 million from a long-lost relative. But there’s a catch: if he can spend it all in 30 days, without any property remaining, then he’ll inherit $300 million. Also, he can’t tell anyone what he’s doing. So Monty—to his closest friends (one of them played by John Candy)—looks like he’s squandering a once-in-a-lifetime inheritance. Along the way, he learns how badly wealth can ruin our relationships and happiness.

Part of what makes the movie so fun is how hard it is for him to spend the money. Not emotionally hard, but practically hard. Big piles of money, it turns out, attract even more money.

As of May 8, 2025, the Gates Foundation is Monty Brewster.

If you didn’t see the news, Bill Gates announced that he will give away all of his wealth, currently around $113 billion. It will all be done through the Gates Foundation, which over the last 25 years has spent $100 billion in grants and operations around the world to fight disease, fund education, and reduce poverty. Additionally, the Gates Foundation will close its doors on December 31, 2045. This deadline, originally set for 20 years after Bill’s death, got moved up by a few decades.

There are so many interesting things about this decision, like bucking the trend of legacy foundations that live forever and how the money may be all given away before he dies. (He’ll be 90 at the end of 2045.)

But the most interesting thing is how hard it’s going to be to actually give it away effectively.

Why Effective Giving Is Hard at Scale

Briefly, I feel like I should answer the very reasonable question, “What’s so hard about giving money away?” The answer is, “Nothing.” If the only challenge is getting the money out of Bill Gates’ accounts and into other people’s pockets, he could do it all rather quickly. We’d all be happy to help, if it came to that. :)

The hard part is giving the money away so that it does what Gates wants it to do, like eliminate neglected tropical diseases for 200 million kids, improve sanitation for the 1.5 billion people without a flush toilet, or create financial access for the 25% of adults who don’t have something as simple as a bank account. These are just a handful of the very tough problems the Gates Foundation has been working to solve for 25 years.

There are some problems, like delivery of medical treatments, that just require money. (This is why Gates took a widely publicized jab at Elon Musk and DOGE for dismantling life-saving USAID programs. No doubt Gates will be doing what he can to fill the gap.) But many problems are not only a function of money. Solving these sorts of problems requires political willpower, or inventions that don’t yet exist, or a cost far beyond what Gates will be able to fund. For example, in his book Impact, Sir Ronald Cohen estimated that meeting the UN Sustainable Development Goals would cost $30 trillion. That’s about 150 times what Gates plans to give away.

Gates’ Giving Will Be Historic

Knowing how hard this will be, it explains why this scale of giving is historically unprecedented. By the time John D. Rockefeller died, he’d given away $540 million or about $12 billion in 2025 dollars. Andrew Carnegie gave away $350 million, equivalent to around $6 billion today. In fact, it was Carnegie’s essay, The Gospel of Wealth, that Gates credits for his philanthropic passion. Carnegie famously wrote that “the man who dies thus rich dies disgraced.”

A modern equivalent of this level of giving has been MacKenzie Scott. She’s also broken the mold of billionaire philanthropy by giving away $19.2 billion over the last five years. Notably, her giving has been almost entirely unrestricted and unsolicited by the nonprofits she chose. Instead of typically resource-intensive grant applications, Scott’s relied on a quiet vetting process guided by experts like those at the Lever for Change Foundation. (I have a delightful and fascinating podcast episode with their CEO, Dr. Cecilia Conrad. You should give it a listen.)

It Will Probably Be More Than $200b

The Gates Foundation will be increasing their grant-making to $10 billion per year in order to try and give the money away by 2045. Whether or not that’s enough to keep pace with the Brewster-esque goal remains to be seen. There’s some lack of clarity around this, based on what Gates has said. He noted that, depending on market trends, the Foundation will give away around $200 billion by 2045.

Between the $113 billion he currently owns, and the $77 billion already managed by the Foundation trust, this amount of wealth collectively creates at least $10 billion in annual investment returns. There may be overlap between his wealth and the foundation trust, but I don’t think that’s the case. So I’m not sure why Gates estimated the $200 billion total, and he unquestionably knows far more about it than I do.

But I find this part of the problem fascinating. It’s just so much money to give away. Warren Buffett’s kids are going to be in a similar boat. They’ll be tasked with giving away ~$144 billion in just ten years. Between the two entities, nothing like this will have happened ever before.


To add important perspective, Americans collectively give about $550 billion per year to charity. All of this new philanthropy is still quite small compared to what’s already being given annually by everyday people.

But, there will still be amazing things to come. Since its inception, the Gates Foundation just through Gavi (vaccines) and the Global Fund (treatments for HIV, malaria, and TB) has helped save around 80 million lives. It’s incredible to imagine the good that can come from the next 20 years.

I think what’s most amazing is that the money will make big things possible, but it will be many thousands of people—experts and workers of all kinds—who will make it happen. These are the people who do the live-saving and life-changing work that Gates has funded. Perhaps those people will include some of you who are reading this. Like I said, amazing!

”It’s very difficult to hate someone up close.”

Japanese literature professor, Sachi Schmidt-Hori, consulted Ubisoft on their latest Assassin’s Creed game, and it was somehow discovered that she helped create a Black African samurai character for the game.

Despite the character being based on a real person, Prof. Schmidt-Hori was attacked viciously online by those accusing her of “wokeness.” Instead of going into hiding or lashing out at the critics, she contacted each critic personally to have a conversation.

And it worked.

”The intervention that she did was pretty brilliant in terms of sort of stopping that toxic train in its tracks and putting another spin on how people are engaging with her,” Mays said. “She’s sort of breaking the spell of that online disinhibition community involvement and forcing people to address her as a human and an individual.”

Harassed by Assassin’s Creed gamers, a professor fought back with kindness

Transcending Tragedy with Love • Rabbi Jeffrey Myers, Tree of Life Synagogue • s03e01

Transcending Tragedy with Love • Rabbi Jeffrey Myers, Tree of Life Synagogue • s03e01

Summary

In the wake of unimaginable tragedy, how does a community find its way forwardand what can we learn from their resilience? In this episode, I talk with Rabbi Jeffrey Myers, who survived the deadliest anti-Semitic attack in American history at Pittsburgh’s Tree of Life Synagogue. Rabbi Myers shares how his congregation and the broader Pittsburgh community responded to hatred with overwhelming acts of kindness and solidarity, and how he’s become a national voice for interfaith understanding and eradicating the “H-word” from our daily lives.

About Our Guest

Rabbi Hazzan Jeffrey Myers has served as the Rabbi and Cantor for the Tree of Life in Pittsburgh since the summer of 2017. He moved to the City of Bridges after spending decades in ministry in New Jersey and Long Island. He received a BA from Rutgers, an MA in Jewish Education from the Jewish Theological Seminary and studied privately with Cantor Zvi Aroni before graduating from the Cantorial School of The Jewish Theological Seminary of America. 

After the horrific morning of October 27, 2018, when a heavily armed gunman began a murderous rampage in the Tree of Life, Rabbi Myers—who survived the attack—became the face of the tragedy. Since then, he has set about sending the key message that love is stronger than hate. Rabbi Myers contends that a lack of understanding of our neighbors leads to fear and sometimes loathing, which can lead to acts of violence. Rabbi Myers believes that if we are ever to remove the "H word" from our society, it must start with pledging not to use that word in speech, just as he has done in honor of the 11 lives lost at the Tree of Life. 

Rabbi Myers is a recipient of multiple awards, including 2019 recipient of the Simon Wiesenthal Center Medal of Valor, given out to those who exemplify the good deeds of outstanding individuals who honor mankind and whose courage and bravery shine a light in the darkest of places. Because of his service and actions during and after the Tree of Life massacre, Rabbi Myers received the medal which is inscribed: “He who saves a single life, it is as if he has saved an entire world.” He has testified before both Houses of Congress, participated in many gatherings in the White House, and has spoken throughout the United States on the proliferation of H-speech.

Useful Links

Tree of Life Synagogue – Rabbi Myers’ Community: https://www.treeoflifepgh.org

Rabbi Myers on Responding to Hate (CNN Feature): https://www.cnn.com/2020/07/18/us/rabbi-myers-pittsburgh-hate/index.html

Pittsburgh Synagogue Shooting – Background (Wikipedia): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pittsburgh_synagogue_shooting

Follow How to Help

Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/how.to.help.pod/

Threads: https://www.threads.com/@how.to.help.pod

Bluesky: https://bsky.app/profile/howtohelp.bsky.social

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/HowToHelpPod

Pleasant Pictures Music

Join the Pleasant Pictures Music Club to get unlimited access to high-quality, royalty-free music for all of your projects. Use the discount code HOWTOHELP15 for 15% off your first year.

Transcript

[00:00:00] Rabbi Myers: I think we've seen throughout history plenty of examples of a single individual who made a difference to any of your listeners. One of them can also be that singular individual to make a difference. There's nothing stopping them from being that person to quote, um, a well-known sneaker manufacturer.

Just do it.

[00:00:18] Aaron - Interview: That's great. The best use of that slogan ever actually.

[00:00:24] Aaron - Narration: Hi, I'm Aaron Miller, and this is How to Help, a podcast about having a life and career with meaning, integrity, and impact. This is season three, episode one: Transcending Tragedy with Love.

How to Help is proud to join the BYU Radio family of podcasts. This means you might be new to our show, and so if you are, please take a look at our past episodes and subscribe for future ones. You can find them all at byuradio.org or at how-to-help.com. You can also follow us on Instagram, Threads, and Bluesky. Look for links to those in the show notes. And thank you for listening. I hope you thoroughly enjoy our new season.

On October 27th, 2018, during Shabbat morning services, a gunman entered the Tree of Life Synagogue in Pittsburgh and he opened fire, killing 11 worshipers and injuring seven others. Among the wounded were four police officers who had risked their lives capturing the shooter. After his arrest, he was tried in federal court and sentenced to death row. His horrific attack on these worshipers is the deadliest anti-Semitic attack in American history.

Rabbi Jeffrey Meyers, who was leading services that morning, helped evacuate some congregants but couldn't reach everyone. Since that tragic day, he has become a leader in the fight against religious intolerance and hate.

What happens in the aftermath of such senseless violence. How does a community heal? How does faith persist? Rabbi Meyers shows us a way through the darkness. Today, we'll learn from a community's response to hatred and what they can teach us about resilience, about love, about faith, and about the enduring power of hope.

[00:02:19] Rabbi Myers: I'd like to think I'm a hopeful person. I'm a pragmatist, but I'm also an optimist at the same time. And I still believe, like Anne Frank did, that people are basically good.

[00:02:31] Aaron - Narration: This was such an inspiring conversation to me, and I know it will be for you too. But as we begin, you're going to hear me use a word for the last time in this episode. The word is hate. From here on, I'll be calling it the H-word. This isn't my idea, it's Rabbi Myers'. He's been encouraging people for years to scrub the H-word from their daily conversations.

[00:02:56] Aaron - Interview: I'm curious what reactions you've gotten from others as you have encouraged eliminating that word from our vocabulary.

[00:03:05] Rabbi Myers: Actually, I've been really pleased with the positive response from people to take a moment and digest the idea. It makes them think more about just the impact of words. In particular, how hard it is to excise a word from our vocabulary that we just use so easily and readily without giving thought to how emotion laden the  H-word is.

People will smile, they'll, they'll try it, and frequently people who haven't taken the  H-word pledge will cover their mouth instantly and apologize to me for having used it, and they'll at least call the  H-word for that time being. Give it a try and we'll discover it's really difficult. We just toss it about so easily.

[00:03:57] Aaron - Interview: I, I'm sure there will be listeners who wonder if this is authentic, who wonder if, if they had the opportunity to sort of spy on Rabbi Meyers throughout the day, if they were ever actually hear the word.

Maybe you could talk about the day-to-day reality of, of trying to not ever use the word.

[00:04:13] Rabbi Myers: I would say this: when I'm meeting a group for the first time, who aren't aware of the pledge or need to know more, I'll use the word once to model so they know which word I'm talking about.

[00:04:25] Aaron - Interview: Mm-hmm.

[00:04:25] Rabbi Myers: And then teach what the choice is. On that rare occasion if I'm doing, say, an English reading and there might be the adjective or other form of it, so it's not just the immediate four letters, I might use that, or I might just say H-full as opposed to the combined word. But as peculiar as I think people might find it, they'll hear me just say, "I don't like it." "I'm unhappy about it." and comparable things like that.

I'll give you a perfect example. I remember I was in the parking lot of a supermarket. I was leaving the supermarket walking towards my car. A woman was pushing one of the shopping carts. You know, sometimes when you get a shopping cart with that one annoying wheel that doesn't cooperate.

And she goes, "Oh, I just..." and I said, yeah, we just use it so matter of factly, as opposed to, you know, if it happened to me, I would've said, "Oh, this is so annoying." I would've put the cart back and got another cart. She just continued onto the supermarket with a cart with a defective wheel, which I didn't understand why, but it just typified for me how easy it is to just toss it around.

[00:05:42] Aaron - Interview: I think we do this with that word in a lot of ways in the emotions tied to it. I think we sit with those feelings even though we're not obligated to, nobody's forcing it upon us. I think we choose it in many ways.

[00:05:54] Rabbi Myers: And, and I just felt that the real power of suggesting to people that it's a four letter word that belongs in that small collection of other four letter obscenities, gives it, um, a sort of different perspective.

and perception and, and that was my hope and desire from it. Will it change the world? No. I'm, I'm not naive. But if it makes some people think and in the end, if there's one person who might use a, a calmer word and potentially not lead them to a violent act, to me, wonderful. That's what it's about.

[00:06:36] Aaron - Narration: I love the idea of treating the H word as profane.

What it represents certainly drives some of the most profane and horrible deeds that happen in the world. The  H-word can treat such vile things so casually. This is part of the reason in this episode that there won't be a detailed explanation of the tragedy itself, nor will we mention the killer's name. Rehearsing those things does little for us.

But what's extraordinary and worth every minute of this episode is the story of how the Tree of Life community transcended the cruelty of what happened. They didn't do it on their own. Indeed, they were immediately enveloped in love and support.

[00:07:18] Rabbi Myers: Although I'm now at Pittsburgher, I did not originally hail from Pittsburgh, but I came to learn first in my initial year

here is that. people pulling for each other and working as community is the nature of Pittsburgh. It's not the exception. However, when you have such a horrific event, is that even, more so, people from all backgrounds reached out. All faiths, all sexual orientations, all colors, et cetera, everybody reached out in ways small, medium, and large, and extra large.

"How can we help? What do you need? What can we do?" There were hundreds of stories of these incredible acts of, of kindness that really moved me and taught me. That's part of what makes Pittsburgh special, is that innate nature. And Pittsburgh is a, a rather significant immigrant community of people who come from literally all over the world to settle in Pittsburgh over the centuries. So it's not the stream of just one particular country. Just all together, that's what pi, what Pittsburghers are all about. And to me that's just something incredible. Beautiful. You wish you could package it and share it. I don't know if, if that's possible. I think it's just, it's just the nature of what Pittsburghers are like and I've, I've lived in different places in my life and I've never experienced, uh, that kind of grace, that kind of

loving kindness for all fellow human beings. It's remarkably beautiful and I'm grateful that I've been the recipient. And the best I can do is return that kindness every occasion I have.

[00:08:58] Aaron - Narration: Not long after their own tragedy, the Tree of Life congregants had just such an occasion to return kindness. In Christchurch, New Zealand, just five months after the Tree of Life shooting, an attacker went to two different Islamic mosques where he opened fire killing 51 people and injuring 40. Rabbi Myers and his congregation sprung into action raising over $50,000 in just four days, all of the funds going to help the families who lost loved ones. Tree of Life knew firsthand why this mattered.

[00:09:34] Rabbi Myers: There's a, a, a foundational story to then act. In the immediate aftermath of the shooting at the Tree of Life, 36 hours later that Sunday evening, it was a vigil at one of the major municipal buildings in Pittsburgh, the Soldiers and Sailors War Memorial, it's called. I believe it seats roughly 2000 people. There were thousands outside.

I met for the first time, the executive director of the Islamic Center in Pittsburgh, which is located in the middle of the University of Pittsburgh campus. And he announced from the stage at that time that they'd found put together a GoFundMe pitch to fund the funerals.

[00:10:14] Aaron - Narration: It's a practice of both the Jewish and Muslim faith to bury their dead quickly, usually within 24 hours. Wasi Muhammad, the executive director for the Islamic Center, knew this and worked to make sure that the funds were distributed without delay.

[00:10:31] Rabbi Myers: Now, one family had to pay for the funeral, and I thought, first off, what an incredibly beautiful gesture. Number two, what a powerful statement to the rest of the world who just think nonstop that Jews and Muslims can't get along. So when the horrific shooting in the two mosques in Christchurch, New Zealand occurred, that was the proper, immediate response was "Of course we have to do that."

[00:10:56] Aaron - Narration: Not only did Tree of Life raise money for the victims on the other side of the globe, they also came to comfort and care for the Muslims in their own community.

That Friday at Juma prayers at the Islamic Center, Rabbi Meyers arrived with a group of his own congregation to show support for the Islamic community in Pittsburgh.

[00:11:17] Rabbi Myers: We made sure there was food and no one had to worry about eating, and we were just there to support them and, and how grateful they were.

And it just showed that's what communities of faith are about. We're here for each other and that, well, my faith might not be yours, that doesn't mean that we have, don't have so much in common. And to me, that's what building bridges is about. And Pittsburgh knows how to build bridges. We have the most bridges in the United States 446. But to me it's not about steel bridges or iron bridges, it's about human bridges from community to community to connect each other. And that's just, just one story of many of building bridges between communities.

[00:12:00] Aaron - Narration: Rabbi Myers is a diligent bridge-builder. In the last six years, he's been a national leader in establishing interfaith understanding. And this has taken him around the country and even to Washington where he testified before both houses of Congress.

Along the way, he's built lasting friendships with leaders of many different faiths like Reverend Eric Manning, who experienced a shooting at his church in 2015. In connecting with the leaders of different faiths, rabbi Meyers hopes to model the care and concern we should all show for each other.

[00:12:35] Rabbi Myers: It's the hard work of one-on-one relationships, and that's investing an immense amount of time. But I think it's worth it. And the time that I've invested has been primarily religious leaders because they're the ones that open the doors to all of their parishioners. So to be able to say that I'm on first name basis and have the cell phone number of, of the Roman Catholic Bishop of the Diocese of Pittsburgh, as one example of many, that's part of, of building those relationships.

Because when you do, then there's so much that you can talk about that goes beyond mere clergy to clergy, but can go into greater depth in terms of conversation, things that matter, avenues to open up and explore, ways to be creative that would've never even thought about, ways to build bridges because the clergy model, eventually it saturates down into the parishioners because we, we are the role models of...whatever behaviors we model, our congregants then say that that's acceptable. If we are role models in a negative manner, we're then saying to people it's okay to behave and speak, that way. If we will model the right things to say and the right ways to behave, that's what people will then see and hopefully duplicate.

[00:13:57] Aaron - Narration: When you look at his leadership, it's fascinating to know that Rabbi Myers becoming the leader of the Tree of Life Synagogue almost didn't happen. He shared with me how he ended up as a rabbi, and then how he came to Tree of Life.

[00:14:11] Rabbi Myers: Judaism is the only faith, to the best of my knowledge, that has two clergy, rabbi and cantor.

Rabbi from the Hebrew, meaning my teacher, and the essential role of the rabbi within the community, although it's evolved over the millennia, is to be the chief interpreter and teacher of the Hebrew Bible. The cantor from the Latin "canto" to sing is the one who chants the prayers, interprets them, and chants them for the congregation.

Both are ordained clergy. There's a lot of similarity and overlap in terms of responsibilities like pastoral care for congregants, just as one example. Teaching, both rabbis and cantors do teach in the in their congregations.

[00:15:03] Aaron - Narration: Because not all synagogues can afford both a rabbi and a cantor, Rabbi Myers' wife suggested that he seek to be ordained so that he could fill both roles.

It wasn't even something he used at first, but when the time was right, it led him to the Tree of Life in Pittsburgh.

[00:15:21] Rabbi Myers: It is only, I think, upon looking back over the years that I see that was the path. At the time, when I made the decision that I was gonna go to cantorial school, I didn't realize that was the path that was laid out for me.

It's only upon reflection and saying, oh, look at all of those touchstones along the way. Now I get it. But at the time when you're seemingly a passenger and not the driver of your car, I didn't see all of those touchstones. And it was just out of luck, that led to a phone call with someone here at Tree of Life, which led into an interview, which eventually then brought me to Pittsburgh.

I came into town July 31st, 2017, and then 14 months later was the shooting.

[00:16:08] Aaron - Narration: In any role like that of a rabbi, a pastor, a minister, or a bishop one quickly comes to know and love the people of the congregation, and those of us who attend weekly services come to know and love each other. In preparation for this episode, I spent time learning about the victims at the Tree of Life Synagogue.

And I was struck by how much they reminded me of the people who attend my congregation. Even now as I think about it, I feel a small measure of the sorrow that we would all feel if we lost some of our own in such a tragic way.

[00:16:39] Aaron - Interview: I'm wondering if you could just share some thoughts or feelings you have about, about those people that were lost and how their memory is enduring.

[00:16:45] Rabbi Myers: I try to focus on what each of those people brought to our Sabbath worship in a joyous sort of way. The fun nature of who they were. The happier moments, and I prefer to focus on that as opposed to taking not just one day, but one unit of time and saying that that's what defines them, because it's not.

It's how they live their lives that defines them. And I try to focus on that in those moments of joy. Most cases, it's an unplanned, spontaneous moment that, oh. So-and-so would've said this, or So-and-so would've done, or I could just see So-and-so standing there doing such a thing. And to celebrate their life, I also feel that when you speak about someone who has passed on and you reference them, they then live through your words and it's their presence that inhabits the space that you're in.

[00:17:41] Aaron - Interview: Are there things you wish people had the chance to know about them?

[00:17:44] Rabbi Myers: You know, I can speak about people, but the challenge is words can't always paint the picture. It's being present with people to not merely know about something that someone might have said or done, but to fully embrace what was the occasion? What was the event?

How did it all play out in real time? Because that gives the picture. So for people who didn't really know any of the 11 victims, yes, you can read about them, you can read obituaries, stories, reminiscences and so forth. But to get the fullest flavor, it's really hard to do that because even a picture of them doesn't tell you enough.

It's having had the privilege to being in their lives, seeing them in action and witnessed the things that they do, that's a treasure. And I'm just grateful that I had those opportunities.

[00:18:43] Aaron - Narration: It takes time to come to a place where you can remember people who are gone in a way that brings joy. Rabbi Meyers noted that in our conversation. To be a faith leader who is also in mourning presents a unique kind of difficulty. You're asked to comfort others when you're one who needs comforting. This story of his shows how hard it can be.

[00:19:06] Rabbi Myers: In the aftermath of the shooting, my wife at the time was working at Jewish Day School and the students had put together a special service within a few days of it, plus an outdoor memorial service.

The eighth graders knew many of the victims because we had a a weekly prayer service that they would join us for the service on a weekday morning. We'd give them breakfast, and then they would be taken to classes. So many of the eighth graders, as seventh graders, knew the deceased. So it was really beautiful they did that.

So I came there for services and I really didn't wanna go, but my wife said, "You need to go. It's the students have done this to support them."

So when, and I had not prayed to that point, uh, I just couldn't get it out. So I stood there and as we reached a particular part of the service where we chanted together, it couldn't come out, nothing came out.

It's like, open your mouth and nothing. Terribly distressing to me.

I just quickly ushered myself out of the room because I was really distressed by that moment. And recognizing my own trauma, "Where am I gonna go right at this moment? What do I turn to?" And it's the answer of course is God, but how in what way?

And the immediate answer I got was Psalms. Psalms reflect the complex life of King David, warrior, statesman, poet, all rolled into one, which is an an incredible combination. If there's anybody who's experienced the entire panoply of emotion in their life, it's King David. There's gotta be something in there somewhere that's gonna help give me some direction.

So I just started with Psalm 1 and just was going through them. Had not found anything yet till I got to the 121st of which their 150. The 121st song. "I lift my eyes to the hills. From whence does my help come? My help comes from God, Maker of the heavens and earth." And there was my answer and my practice then became, uh, everyday, start the day with that. It helped reassure me that yes, God was with me, God is with me, and God will continue to be with me.

[00:21:18] Aaron - Narration: This Psalm became the inspiration later for the Tree of Life Synagogue to commission what Rabbi Meyers titled "A Psalm for Pittsburgh." Verses one, two, and eight from Psalm 121 were set to an original musical piece by composer Gerald Cohen. At a performance five years after the shooting, Rabbi Myers sang it with the Pittsburgh Youth Chorus and a special ensemble arranged by the group Violins of Hope.

[00:21:46] Rabbi Myers: For your listeners unfamiliar, a number of musical instruments were found in the aftermath of the Holocaust, owned by Jews. The owners, for the most part, had perished. These instruments over time were rescued, refurbished by this wonderful father and son team and brought back to life to be able to be the witness to tell the story of the owner through music.

And what I initially had envisioned was, uh, a children's course. And the reason for children was because of the hope for the brighter future. And the string instruments that were played that evening for that piece were from the Violins of Hope collection. So, uh, uh, a violin, viola, and a cello that had been rescued and refurbished were played.

So it was powerful in many different levels. So I had my entire congregation for those who could participate, commission it as singular individuals, but yet as a congregation. It surpassed my wildest hopes for what type of piece it could be. It was incredibly moving to me, I know to students. And I recall at the, the last rehersal when I finally got to hear the whole piece, 'because it was the only rehearsal we had with the, uh, instrumentalists.

As it finished, I just wept. It was just the power of music.

[00:23:04] Aaron - Narration: There are so many ways that people heal from tragedy, but I think they almost all involve other people. I ask Rabbi Myers to share his thoughts about how we can help others to heal from such events.

[00:23:18] Rabbi Myers: The fact that people care and want to help is really meaningful.

Sometimes the best thing to do is just ask, "How can I help? What do you need?" But don't be surprised if sometimes people in the midst of tragedy, or even trauma, may not yet know the answers of what they need. That only through time can they adequately begin to formulate an answer to that. And it's not anyone's fault or such. It's the nature of, uh, trauma that we don't know what we don't know. And sometimes it takes time. There's many, so many who step forward and sometimes we say we just don't know. And, as frustrating as that might be to people of goodwill who really, really want to help, sometimes we just don't know.

And even to this day, if people come and ask us, you need help, what can we do? Sometimes we, we still don't know. It's not a function of that you can't make sense, because you can't make sense of the senseless. But to identify what people need, you can't take all of my congregates and put them in one slot and say they all fit there. No two people are the same. Because we're not the same, we all have different needs. We're all at different places in that continuum that I call healing.

And the continuum is not that we're always going upward. I'd like to think that from 30,000 feet, the view is that we're, is that a collective moving upward and continuing to heal. But I think if you would come down and literally put it under a microscope, it might look like in a oscilloscope, with peaks and valleys and peaks and valleys. There will be good moments and bad moments within the same day, a good moment, a bad moment. A good moment. A bad moment. But if you again take it way back, I'd like to think that we are gradually moving up. I submit that. I don't think a community that faces mass violence,

mass murder in our case, can maybe necessarily fully heal. We'll reach as far as we can reach, but I think that process has just continued for the life of the community.

[00:25:34] Aaron - Interview: What still gives you hope today for eliminating the H-word? And I don't just mean the use of it I mean it's, you know, everything it represents.

[00:25:42] Rabbi Myers: I like to think I'm a hopeful person. I'm a pragmatist, but I'm also an optimist at the same time. And I still believe, like Anne Frank did that, people are basically good. I've seen that over the years that I still at cards and letters and emails and so forth from strangers I've never met, sending supportive word, a prayer and so forth, which tells me that the vast majority of the people on this planet are good, decent people.

The media doesn't help us. No, social media doesn't help us because bad news sells. The uglier it is the more we like to gawk at it, but I don't believe that's what our society is about. I believe our society is about good people working in the trenches, trying to just make life better for their fellow citizens.

And I believe they're far more of those people out there. They just don't get the publicity that they deserve. It's the ones not doing good who achieve notoriety, who get our attention all the time. I don't know if you can necessarily change that, but, uh, I do believe that there is enough of a silent majority that needs to find a way somehow to become a vocal majority, to be able to respond in cases where there's a bad actor and say, no, this is not okay.

This is unacceptable. Whether it's based upon one's faith, based upon the laws of the land, whatever that support would be say, no, it doesn't belong here. So I still believe there are plenty of people who can effect that change. And I think we've seen throughout history, plenty of examples of a single individual who made a difference.

I have hope. It's really easy to just see the dark, and if you've ever gone to a dark room, a singular match erases all the dark. That's all it is. Be the match!

[00:27:43] Aaron - Narration: Light to penetrate darkness is a central feature in the new building under construction where the previous synagogue stood. 80% of the old structure is being rebuilt to include not only a place of worship for Tree of Life, but also a memorial for the 11 victims, and a new museum dedicated to understanding the roots of anti-Semitism.

Spanning the distance of the building will be an atrium whose light is designed to symbolize hope. When we can be that match described by Rabbi Myers, no matter how dimly we think we flicker, we have the power to banish darkness in the lives of others. Evil deeds do not define those who suffer at the hands of evil doers, not when they can define themselves through hope, faith, and love.

And we, in turn, have the opportunity to shed some of our light on them just as they do for us. I hope you were as inspired as I have been by Rabbi Myers and the Tree of Life congregation. I'm incredibly grateful to Rabbi Myers for spending the time with us.

How To Help is hosted and written by me, Aaron Miller, and producing collaboration with BYU Radio.

My thanks to Erika Price, Kenny Mears, and Blake Morris for their help with this episode. Scoring and mixing was done by Seth Miller, and our music is by Eric Robertson and the Pleasant Pictures Music Club. For more information about this episode, use the links in the show notes, and if you haven't subscribed yet to How to Help, you can do that in your favorite podcast player.

As always, thank you so much for listening.

NEWSLETTER

Sign up to get How to Help delivered to your inbox.

No spam and I don’t share your info.

Great! Please check your inbox and click the confirmation link.
Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.